Urgent Warning. WHO has quietly re-written International Health Regulations. Oppose UK support - sign Petition below before 18 July 2025.

 

The World Health Organization is trying to expand its authority through dangerous amendments to the International Health Regulations. If accepted, these changes could pressure governments to impose lockdowns, vaccine mandates, censorship, and surveillance — all without a vote in Parliament. The UK has until 19 July 2025 to reject these amendments and protect national sovereignty. Sign the petition now to demand that the Prime Minister and Health Secretary take immediate action to opt out. SIGN THE PETITION After CitizenGO’s global pushback forced the WHO to strip some of the most authoritarian and far-reaching powers from the Pandemic Agreement, you’d think they would have backed down. But rather than accept defeat or respect the will of the people whose lives they seek to control, the WHO is now trying to restore those same powers by rewriting the International Health Regulations (IHR).  Determined to bypass public resistance, the WHO has rewritten the International Health Regulations to include sweeping new powers that: Make it easier to enforce lockdowns and travel restrictions around the world as part of a top-down global response, with no regard for individual rights or national sovereignty Establish an international expectation that member states will impose vaccine mandates during any future WHO-declared “pandemic emergency,” all in the name of global solidarity and fulfilling international obligations Will censor free speech and lawful viewpoints, especially from those who question official narratives or raise legitimate concerns about government measures Expand international powers to collect and share personal health data, potentially paving the way for digital IDs and global tracking systems in the name of “preparedness” Blur the line between international advice and domestic law, prompting governments to adopt WHO policies, even when they go against local interests or public opposition Create a precedent for future non-health-related 'emergencies' — such as climate or information threats — to be treated as justification for similar sweeping controls When the UK joined the International Health Regulations in 2005, it accepted that amendments adopted by the World Health Assembly would take effect automatically, unless a formal rejection is issued within 10 months under Article 59.  As the IHR amendments were adopted on 1 June 2024, the UK has until 19 July 2025 to reject them. If no action is taken, they will come into force by default without a public vote, without a parliamentary debate, and without your consent. This power grab must not go unchallenged! We’ve already proven that pressure works. Thanks to the efforts of millions of CitizenGO supporters worldwide, some of the most serious threats to national sovereignty and personal freedom were removed from the final Pandemic Agreement.  Your sustained pressure also led to the inclusion of a vital sovereignty clause in the final text, which makes clear that governments are under no legal obligation to follow the demands of unelected globalist bureaucrats at the WHO or UN. Now we must bring that same determination to the fight against the IHR amendments. The UK government can still opt out, but will only do so if we make our opposition known. Please sign the petition now to urge the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, and Health Secretary, Wes Streeting, to reject the IHR amendments immediately. What makes the IHR amendments more dangerous is that they are being introduced alongside the Pandemic Agreement. Together, the IHR amendments and the Pandemic Agreement form a coordinated strategy to shift power away from elected governments and into the hands of unelected globalists operating through the WHO and the UN. The IHR amendments give the WHO new processes and powers to declare a “pandemic emergency” and exert pressure on national governments to comply with its international recommendations. The Pandemic Agreement pressures countries to align their decision-making, budgets, and emergency systems with WHO-led coordination whenever a “pandemic emergency” has been declared. This includes sharing data, medical supplies, and financial resources. While not legally binding, these instruments create strong international expectations and political pressure to conform. That pressure could give bad governments a ready-made script to justify lockdowns, vaccine mandates, censorship, or other extreme measures while blaming “international obligations” or pointing to “global solidarity.” You helped change the course of the Pandemic Agreement. But now, dangerous new IHR amendments threaten to undo the freedoms we fought so hard for. This is our moment to protect freedom again. Add your name to our petition to urge the UK government to reject the WHO’s latest power grab. Brian, you and I have seen firsthand what so-called 'emergency powers' can do. We lived through lockdowns, vaccine mandates, the banning of church services and more. Now imagine it happening all over again — not by your government’s choice, but on the orders of a globalist bureaucrat at the WHO. That is exactly what the IHR amendments could make possible, unless we stop them. Help stop history from repeating itself. Sign the petition now and reject this global power grab. Thank you for standing with me once more, Sebastian Lukomski and the entire CitizenGO team P.S. I know this stuff is dense, and staying on top of it all can be exhausting. But you and I? We don’t get to check out – not if we care about freedom.  Because 19 July is the deadline. That’s when these amendments to the IHR will automatically pass without a national vote or parliamentary scrutiny. Just silence from your government, and boom, it's done. But there’s time to give these WHO radicals a BOOM of our own! Just one letter from your leaders is all it takes. We’ll be hand-delivering this petition to Sir Keir Starmer KCB KC MP and Wes Streeting MP in the coming days. Please ensure your name is on the petition. Sign the petition now and protect your freedoms before it’s too late. More information: - Open Letter to World Leaders: REJECT the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations [James Roguski]: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-world-leaders - Rewarding the WHO for Covid Failures [Daily Sceptic | Ramesh Thakur]: https://dailysceptic.org/2025/06/01/rewarding-the-who-for-covid-failures/ - The WHO’s plan for public-health tyranny [Spiked]: https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/05/08/the-whos-plan-for-public-health-tyranny/ - Why the WHO’s pandemic planning poses a threat to Britain [Spectator (£) | Andrew Tettenborn]: https://archive.ph/VMXoC - Why is the WHO calling critics ‘conspiracy theorists’? [UnHErd (£) | Kevin Bardosh]: https://archive.ph/C4bft

The radical globalists and woke elites want to erase our values—but together, we stand strong. CitizenGO is a movement of millions around the world, fighting every day to defend life, family, and freedom against those who seek to undermine them. We are faithful, so we will never quit.

This email was sent to limpetcountry@outlook.com. To update your email preferences or unsubscribe, click here. To ensure our emails reach you, please add petitions-en@citizengo.org to your address book.

Have questions or want to share your thoughts? Just hit reply—we’d love to hear from you! Every reply is read by a real person like you, someone passionate about defending freedom.

A Sign of Renewed Life

 Wednesday, 5 February 2025

A Sign of Renewed Life Br Paul Mary ad

A Sign of Renewed Life

 Br Paul Mary admires the new sign for the Mission Immaculata, which will go up once the new fence is properly installed.

ire the new sign for the Mission Iacuwhichwi go up once the new fence is proper installed.

"MISSION IMMACULATA"

'Casting Out the Myth. Did we Perform illegal Exorcisms?'

  

Casting out the M

Dear Readers,    

This post continues to publicise the facts behind the apparently unjust, unwarranted, and grossly inappropriate 'punishment' imposed on the 'Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer', also known as the 'Transalpine Redemptorists', by the Bishop of Christchurch, New Zealand, Bishop Michael Gielen. This 'punishment', seemingly based on 'allegations' rather than facts, and showing in the process a somewhat careless disregard for the letter of both Canon and Common law, has resulted in the complete banning of several priests and brothers from the diocese of Christchurch, which includes their monastic home, and also the banning (temporarily suspended) of religious 'sisters', all of whom priests, brothers, and sisters, had a pivotal role in the spiritual life of their parish, which was established several years ago, with the blessing of the then incumbent Bishop, and which has developed over the years, with recent Sunday Mass attendances running into three figures. The parish is run on traditional lines with liturgy based on the traditional Latin Mass.

    A broader report of this whole matter can be seen in earlier posts on this blogsite, immediately preceding this. 

  Editor.   

                  *********************

(Continued from previous posts written by Fr Michael Mary FssR, Rector Major of the "Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer")

 February 03 2025

The Apostolic Visitator, Bishop Robert McGuckin of Australia, and the Chancellor of Christchurch Diocese had an informal meeting with Fr Michael Mary before the Visitation interviews began.  Fr Michael Mary asked what the Visitation was about.  “The television programmes,” he was told.  Thus, by inference, it was about the supposed illegal exorcisms that were their focus.

The priest who had supposedly carried out these illegal exorcisms was absent, recovering from an extremely grave, life-threatening medical condition.  The Visitator was content not to interview him, which is strange given that these supposed illegal exorcisms were one of the primary focuses of the Visitation.  In fact, exorcisms were never brought up in any of the Visitator’s interviews.

From the Visitator’s report: “Some exorcisms performed by FSSR priests in the past may have been approved but others seem not to have been.”  Given that exorcisms, legal or otherwise, were not spoken about during any of our interviews with the Visitator, and that he didn’t interview the priest who supposedly performed them, one wonders how he managed even to come to this weak conclusion.

The truth is that not all exorcisms are equal.  The respected Dominican moral theologians Frs. Charles Callan & John McHugh say: “Exorcisms are…of two kinds, the solemn and the private [aka major & minor]. The former are…reserved to clerics who have a special and express permission from the Ordinary [Bishop]. The latter kind may [in certain circumstances] be made even by members of the laity….It is recommended that priests frequently use private exorcisms, at least secretly, for persons who are vexed by temptations or scruples.”

Auxiliary Bishop Julian Porteous of Sydney, Australia says in his introduction to a 2010 manual of minor exorcisms: “Minor exorcisms can be a normal part of the ministry of priests and are used to assist people in the spiritual struggle, particularly in the case of oppression.”  The author, Fr Healey explains: “A part, an important part, of the ordinary ministry of a priest is the role of utilising prayers of minor exorcism to meet the spiritual needs of the faithful.” These require no permission.

We had full, written faculties for the cases of Solemn Exorcism our priests performed from three Ordinaries of Christchurch diocese (two Bishops and an Administrator).  There is no “may have been approved” about it.  The faculties will be in the diocesan archives for inspection or could have been provided by us, had we been asked.

All other similar prayers performed by our priests were the minor exorcisms mentioned above, which do not require the permission of a Bishop and are considered by all to be a potential part of the normal ministry of a Catholic priest. 

This distinction is, at this stage, unacknowledged.

It would be extremely constructive and advantageous if all those who claim to have had an exorcism came forward and their paperwork could be examined and verified.  In this way the “may have been...” and the “seem not to have been...” could be entirely cleared up.  One might be forgiven for thinking that this would have been done during the Visitation.  Vague and unspecific statements and accusations are very dangerous.

The extravagant claims in the media (such as that we beat a pregnant woman to get the devil out of her) are inventions of pure fantasy.  If only the Visitator had troubled himself to ask us about them.

 February 03, 2025